Sub-Garn Sands Blog : Part 2 – Sampling Core At The NPD Geobank, Stavanger

Sub-Garn Sands Blog Info Box

Building upon the knowledge we’ve recently gained on the relationships and controls between lithology, facies, provenance, diagenesis, depth and reservoir quality within the Jurassic Garn Formation along the Halten Terrace (2021), this new study will extend our understanding into what PetroStrat defines the ‘Sub-Garn Sand Complex’ (Ile, Tofte and Tilje formations).

We’ll be sharing highlights of our integrated sedimentological and stratigraphic workflow at key project milestones with this series of 6 blog posts.

Other articles in this blog series, and related content;

Our Sub-Garn project team of John Cater, Paddy Clarke and James Scorgie arrived at the NPD Geobank in Stavanger, armed with the permission to collect core samples, and our sampling points picked in advance from review of stratigraphy, CCA data & NPD core photos (read more about this in Blog Post 1). Given the volume of core samples being collected within this 2-week visit, two assistants from Stratum Reservoir’s team in Stavanger kindly provided additional support. 

Examining Core to Confirm Sampling Points

Our primary aim is to collect samples that are representative geologically of the core plugs originally taken so that we can confidently relate new observations from thin-section petrography, SEM imagery, XRD data, chlorite polytyping and isotope geochemistry – to porosity & permeability data of the core plugs. The process entails careful inspection of core pieces laid out in either the viewing rooms or basement area by the NPD, to determine lithological characteristics of core immediately around the area from where core plug was taken.

Principal Reservoir Geologist John Cater examining sections of core under a hand lens PetroStrat
Our Principal Reservoir Geologist John Cater examining sections of core under a hand lens to determine lithological variability around the core plug sampling point, ensuring the samples we collect are representative of the core plug, and relatable to the CCA data

As some of these wells were cored >30 years ago, this rock record retained by the NPD has been extensively sampled and so, it’s important that we leave sufficient material for others. We identify sediments close to, and similar to, the plug point (e.g., avoiding big nodules of cement) from which a 30-gram sample can be taken without using all material from that depth.

John Cater left and Paddy Clarke right marking core samples to be cut PetroStrat
John Cater left, and Paddy Clarke right, marking core samples to be cut, following our review of data in advance of the visit, and observations of the cores around CCA plug points

Workflow for Sampling Core

Safety being paramount, it’s vital that adequate PPE (inc. ear defenders, goggles, and face mask) is worn by those cutting core using the NPD’s manual diamond core saw which is constantly lubricated with water. The operator must carefully orient rock material around saw so to carve out sufficient material, while leaving enough for others.

Diamond core saws in the basement area of the NPD Geobank PetroStrat
Diamond core saws in the basement area of the NPD Geobank, that we used to collect our 275 Sub-Garn samples.

It can be problematic to ensure we collect the 30-gram samples required for our varied analytical program as heavily cemented sections will be denser than others, and you cannot weigh samples until they’re cut. It’s also important to be systematic in (a) noting which is the top and base of the samples being taken and remaining core, (b) bagging samples and labelling the depth, and (c) leaving notes for the NPD on where on the core samples have been collected and the sample weights we’ve recorded. Carefully following this routine meant that we collected 5 or 6 samples per hour, of the 275 being analysed in this multiclient. Where insufficient sample material was available, the NPD kindly provided us existing thin-sections.

Overcoming Challenges During Sampling

Core of the Ile Formation from 6507/7A-17 presented us with a challenge, as the rock wasn’t strongly cemented and beneath a more cohesive form at surface (probably a result of exposure), was found to be loose/disaggregated internally when any pressure was applied. It was decided that cutting a sample from this core using existing methods would needlessly destroy material and obliterate any fine structures (i.e., fracture planes) that we’d like to see in petrography. With the NPD’s permission this core was transported to the Stratum Reservoir laboratories, where a gentler sampling technique without lubrication allowed a sample to be cut, that was securely packaged in a sleeve with caps at each end to prevent disaggregation in transport. With instances like this, we’ve previously advised that loosely consolidated, fragile cores are sampled by artificially cementing a specimen by impregnating with resign, or by freezing it with liquid nitrogen.

You may also like...


Get PetroStrat monthly news updates and general interest articles direct to your inbox!

Your email will never be shared, and you can unsubscribe at any time


Our next newsletter will arrive in your inbox at the end of the month, we hope you enjoy it!